 |
|
|
|
Mid-Term Review of
Annual Policy Statement 2007-08-II (Part-I) |
|
1. Revision in
categorization of banks in the two tiers
All urban banks with deposits of Rs.100 crores
or less but having a few branches in the
contiguous districts need to be categorized as
Tier-I banks.
The issue was discussed at the pre Annual Policy
Meeting in April 2007 and the Governor was kind
enough to say that the issue could be looked at
in respect of those banks whose branches outside
the single district do not account for
significant part of banks' business, say, it
could be less than 25%.
It is requested that the announcement in this
regard may kindly be made in the Mid Term
Review. |
|
|
|
2. Resumption
of consideration of applications for formation
of new urban cooperative bank:
From 2002 onwards, RBI has stopped considering
any applications for formation of new urban
cooperative banks along with stoppage of
issuance of licenses for opening new branches of
existing banks.
Five years of the complete ban has apparently
served its purpose and continuation of this
policy even with a reason of being overcautious,
given the experiences of recent past, will be
counter productive, in the long run, for this
extremely important grass roots segment of the
country's banking industry. Urban cooperative
banks are presently, the single most important
group of financial intermediaries of their kind
with direct involvement of common man in banking
process and management, that have the potential
to be soundly managed with collective
responsibility in a transparent manner. They are
responding encouragingly to the regulatory
tonics being administered by the RBI from time
to time. Not withstanding the known and
perceived shortcomings, the sector is making
significant contribution to the economy of the
states where it has good presence. It is
delivering credit essentially to those strata of
society which require credit badly, and is in a
position to do meaningful exercise of financial
inclusion, beyond just "the number of no frills
accounts opened" exercises.
In view of this, it is time that applications
for new banks are taken up, particularly in
states where the presence of the banks is thin.
Due care may be exercised in evaluating the
proposals and in studying the capabilities of
the persons promoting the organization, before
giving approvals. It is suggested that the scope
of TAFCUBs be extended to study and approve the
proposals of new banks, and branches of existing
banks in addition to those of ATMs that they are
approaching now.
The Federation and the sector feel that absence
of issuance of branch licenses in a meaningful
way and continued ban on registering of new
banks will weaken the sector and it could be a
handicap in its efforts to compete for space in
the fast growing financial sector. |
|
|
|
3. According
Scheduled Status to eligible UCBs
Issue of according scheduled status to those of
the strong urban banks that have applied for the
same to RBI was raised at the last pre Annual
Policy Meeting. While the banks are aware of
additional regulatory requirements to be
complied with, some of them, nevertheless are
particular about the RBI taking a decision on
their applications which are pending for years.
With CRAR and profitability norms having been
comfortably exceeded, some of the banks who have
applied are working with gross NPA of even less
then 1%. Considering the fact that cooperative
banks have very scope of writing off principal
in loan balances, this achievement speaks
volumes of credit judgment of the banks. It
would be unfair to deny them the scheduled
status that they are asking for, under any
reasoning. It is therefore requested that
announcement of commencement of provision of
according scheduled status to banks on selective
basis be kindly made in the mid term review. |
|
|
|
Other Issues
In addition to the above unaddressed issues
flagged by the Federation in the last pre Policy
Meeting, the Federation would request the
Governor to kindly consider examining the
following issues to make suitable announcements.
1. Interest on CRR balances
For various reasons that are well known to the
RBI, the profitability of cooperative banks,
both rural ad urban, are thinner than those of
commercial banks. Therefore, the requirements of
maintaining CRR that does not earn any interest
affects the urban banks. The amount of loss is
sizeable in case of scheduled urban cooperative
banks. RBI is requested to consider making
provision for CRR balances of UCBs to be paid
interest.
2. Report of Working Group on access to
payment system
The report recommends denial of access to
payment system, as direct members of clearing
house at MICR centres, to banks which do not
comply with financial criteria of 9% CRAR, less
than 10% net NPA, no default in CRAR & SLR in
one year and net profit in at least one of the
two preceding years. However, SCBs, DCCBs & RRBs
have been given exemptions in this regard while
UCBs will have to fulfill all the conditions in
order to stay as direct members in the MICR
clearing houses. |
|
|
|
|
 |